MYTHOPOETICS AS A CONCEPTUAL BASIS OF LITERARY CREATIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I12Y2025N68Keywords:
myth, mythopoetics, narrative, myth structure, chronotope, mythological time, mythological space, archetype, hero’s journey, binary oppositions, cultural memory, symbolic system, ritual, remythologization, archaization.Abstract
This extended article analyzes mythopoetics as a conceptual and structural foundation of literary creativity. Special attention is given to interdisciplinary approaches from structuralism to cognitive poetics that view myth not only as a source of plots but as a universal mechanism of cultural modeling, a deep matrix of artistic consciousness. The study examines how myth is transformed within an author’s individual poetics, how archaic and modern narratives interact, and how mythological thinking is represented in diverse literary systems.
References
1. Аверинцев С. С. Поэтика ранневизантийской литературы. — М.: Наука, 1997.
2. Бахтин М. М. Вопросы литературы и эстетики. — М.: Художественная литература, 1975.
3. Кассирер Э. Философия символических форм. Т. 2. Мифологическое мышление. — М.: Академический проект, 2011.
4. Леви-Стросс К. Структурная антропология. — М.: Наука, 1983.
5. Лотман Ю. М. Семиосфера. — СПб.: Искусство-СПБ, 2001.
6. Лосев А. Ф. Диалектика мифа. — М.: Мысль, 1991.
7. Мелетинский Е. М. Поэтика мифа. — М.: Наука, 1976.
8. Пропп В. Я. Морфология сказки. — М.: Лабиринт, 2001.
9. Фрэзер Дж. Золотая ветвь. — М.: Республика, 1998.
10. Элиаде М. Миф о вечном возвращении. — М.: Академический проект, 2014.
11. Campbell J. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. — Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
12. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
13. Genette G. Narrative Discourse. — Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980.
14. Eliade M. Myth and Reality. — New York: Harper & Row, 1963.
15. White H. Metahistory. — Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.
