IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC VALUATION METHODOLOGY BASED ON THE LIFE CYCLE APPROACH OF REAL ESTATE

Authors

  • Jasur Xushvaqtov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I3Y2026N10

Keywords:

real estate valuation, life cycle, valuation methodology, value change, valuation of developing real estate.

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the issues of improving the methodology for real estate valuation based on the life cycle approach. The study examines the suitability of valuation approaches for the phases of the real estate life cycle, from the land plot stage to planning, construction, operation and final disposal. Based on international valuation standards, the features of the application of market, income, cost and residual methods at different stages are analyzed based on empirical data. The results of the study show that important turning points in the life cycle - obtaining zoning and building permits, completion of the development process, commissioning and abandonment of the facility - are of decisive importance in choosing a valuation methodology. The conclusions obtained serve as a methodological basis for improving the practice of mass valuation of real estate, increasing the reliability of valuation results and providing a reasonable explanation for sharp changes in value.

References

1. Heralova, R. Building’s value assessment using the utility and the LCC. CESB 2007 PRAGUE International Conference – Central Europe Towards Sustainable Building. Prague 2007, volume 1, pp. 126-131.

2. International valuation standards council, International valuation standard 2017. EKOPRESS, s.r.o., 2018.

3. Peter Wyatt, Property Valuation in an economic context, First edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007.

4. The European Group Of Valuers Associations, European valuation standards 2016, eighth edition. Tegova 2016.

5. Hlavinkova, V. The market valuation of real estate. Brno University of Technology, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 19-22.

6. French, N. The discounted cash flow model for property valuations: Quarterly in advance cash flows. Oxford Brookes University Oxford, United Kingdom. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, volume 31, Issue 6, 2013, pp. 610-614.

7. The Appraisal Foundation. Identifying Comparable Properties in Automated Valuation Models for Mass Appraisal. APB Valuation Advisory, The Appraisal Foundation, Washington, DC, 2013, pp. 1-5.

8. British Standards Institution; ISO 15686-5:2017, Buildings and constructed assets – Service life planning – Part 5: Life-cycle costing

9. Royal Institution Of Chartered Surveyors (RICS); Sustainability and the RICS property lifecycle, first edition, June 2009.

10. British Standards Institution; Standardized Method of Life Cycle Costing for Construction Procurement; first edition;

11. IFRS Foundation, IFRS Standards required 1 January 2018.

12. CBRE, Czech Republic Property Investment Q4 2017 Snapshot, February 2018.

13. CBRE, Czech Republic Property Investment Q4 2018 Snapshot, February 2019.

14. To‘lakov, U. T. O‘zbekistonda ko‘chmas mulkni ommaviy baholash tizimini joriy etishning strategik va uslubiy jihatlari / U. T. To‘lakov // Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot va tahlil. – 2026. – 4-tom, № 1. – B. 223–228.

15. To‘lakov, U. T. Ko‘chmas mulkni soliqqa tortish va ommaviy baholashda ekonometrik modellashtirish / U. T. To‘lakov // Ilg‘or iqtisodiyot va pedagogik texnologiyalar. – 2025. – 2-tom, № 3. – B. 807–847.

Downloads

Submitted

2026-03-15

Published

2026-03-15

How to Cite

Xushvaqtov, J. (2026). IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC VALUATION METHODOLOGY BASED ON THE LIFE CYCLE APPROACH OF REAL ESTATE. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 6(3), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V6I3Y2026N10