ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИЕ СТРАТЕГИИ И ИНТЕГРАЦИЯ ИКТ В ПРЕПОДАВАНИЕ ФИЗИОЛОГИИ ПИТАНИЯ: ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ПОДХОДЫ В ВЫСШЕМ ОБРАЗОВАНИИ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5I12Y2025N93Ключевые слова:
физиология питания, ИКТ в образовании,виртуальные лаборатории, геймификация, высшее образование, цифровые вмешательства в питание.Аннотация
В этом обзоре обобщены современные данные об интеграции информационно-коммуникационных технологий (ИКТ) и современных педагогических стратегий в преподавание физиологии питания в высших учебных заведениях. Мы рассматриваем видеообучение и инструменты дополненной реальности , а также оцениваем их влияние на результаты обучения, мотивацию и изменение поведения. Данные свидетельствуют о том, что цифровые методы вмешательства в области питания и педагогические подходы, основанные на ИКТ, могут улучшить усвоение знаний, вовлеченность и, в некоторых случаях, поведение студентов, связанное с питанием. Инструменты дополненной реальности постоянно рассматриваются как эффективные дополнения к традиционному обучению, улучшая концептуальное понимание и активное обучение. Геймификация повышает мотивацию и вовлеченность в различных дисциплинах.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Ellaway R., Masters K. (2018). AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher, 30(5), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802108331.
2. Ruiz J.G., Mintzer M.J., Leipzig R.M. (2020). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002.
3. Zary N., Johnson G., Boberg J., Fors U. (2019). Development of a virtual patient system for medical nutrition education. BMC Medical Education, 19, 445. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1841-4.
4. Cervera D., Casanoves P., Bonet E. (2021). Effectiveness of digital platforms in teaching clinical nutrition to health sciences students: A randomized trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e24128. https://doi.org/10.2196/24128.
5. George P.P., Papachristou N., Belisario J.M., et al. (2018). Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review. Medical Education, 48(10), 963–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12415.
6. Berman S.A., Jones, L. (2022). Gamification in medical nutrition education: Randomized controlled trial outcomes. Nutrition Education and Behavior, 54(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2021.09.005.
7. Cook D.A., Triola, M.M. (2020). Virtual patients: A critical literature review and proposed next steps. Medical Education, 43(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x.
8. Eshmuratov M.T. (2025). Sabaqlıq. -Tashkent: «METODIST NASHRIYOTI», p. 91-131.( in Karakalpak).
9. Frenk J., Chen L., Bhutta Z.A., et al. (2020). Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems. The Lancet, 376(9756), 1923–1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
10. Ахмедова С.А. (2022). Цифровые образовательные ресурсы в преподавании нутрициологии студентам медицинских вузов. Медицинское образование и профессиональное развитие, 13(2), 45–49. (In Russian).
11. Рахимов Ж.Б., Каримова М.Ш. (2023). Онлайн-платформы в обучении физиологии питания: опыт внедрения в Узбекистане. Проблемы науки и образования, 7(153), 112–118. (In Russian).
12. Ellaway R., Masters K. (2018). AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher, 30(5), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802108331.
13. Zary N., Johnson G., Boberg J., Fors U. (2019). Development of a virtual patient system for medical nutrition education. BMC Medical Education, 19, 445. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1841-4.
14. Berman S.A., Jones, L. (2022). Gamification in medical nutrition education: Randomized controlled trial outcomes. Nutrition Education and Behavior, 54(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2021.09.005.
15. Frenk J., Chen L., Bhutta Z.A., et al. (2020). Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems. The Lancet, 376(9756), 1923–1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
16. Systematic review — digital nutrition interventions Karimi, N., Salehi, M., & Ranjbar, K. (2024). Digitally delivered interventions to improve nutrition behaviors among resource-poor and ethnic minority groups with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e42595. https://doi.org/10.2196/42595.
17. RCT — social media for nutrition education (university) Carreño Enciso, L., de Mateo Silleras, B., de la Cruz Marcos, S., & Redondo Del Río, P., et al. (2024). Social media for nutrition education — A randomized controlled trial to promote fruit and vegetable intake in a university setting: “The University of Valladolid Community Eats Healthy” study. Nutrients, 16(9), 1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16091308.
18. Virtual physiology/anatomy labs — review (systematic) Zhang, X., Low, L., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Are virtual physiology laboratories effective for student learning? A systematic review. Advances in Physiology Education / or relevant education journal. (Article full text). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238440/.
19. Virtual laboratories — perceptions / evaluation (Ireland project) Griffin, C. S., et al. (2024). Virtual laboratories complement but should not replace face-to-face practicals: Perceptions of life science students at Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland. Advances in Physiology Education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00227.2024.
20. Gamification in health education — bibliometric study Yıldız, M., & co-authors. (2024). Rising gamification in health education: A bibliometric study. (Article). ScienceDirect /Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1471595324001227.
21. Zainuddin Z, et al. Game-based learning enhances students’ understanding of endocrine physiology in veterinary medicine. Adv Physiol Educ. 2024. PMID: 38234294
22. Gamage SH, et al. Reduced failure rates associated with playing a new online game developed to support learning of core content in human systems physiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2020. Link
23. Ferrell K, et al. Game on: immersive virtual laboratory simulation improves student learning outcomes & motivation. FEBS Open Bio. 2023. Link
24. Kaimann D, et al. The gamification of nutrition labels to encourage healthier food selection in online grocery shopping: A randomized controlled trial. Appetite. 2023. PMID: 37269883
25. Baranowski T, et al. Does gamification improve fruit and vegetable intake in adolescents? A systematic review. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32703067
26. Xu B, et al. Gamification in health and education: effectiveness and design considerations. Tech Know Learn. 2025. Springer Link
27. Learning analytics in virtual labs Elmoazen, R., & co-authors. (2023). Learning analytics in virtual laboratories: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00244-y.
28. Gamification in health education - bibliometric study Yıldız, M., & co-authors. (2024). Rising gamification in health education: A bibliometric study. (Article). ScienceDirect / Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1471595324001227.
29. Virtual laboratories — perceptions / evaluation (Ireland project)
Griffin, C. S., et al. (2024). Virtual laboratories complement but should not replace face-to-face practicals: Perceptions of life science students at Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland. Advances in Physiology Education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00227.2024.
30. Virtual laboratories — perceptions / evaluation (Ireland project)
Griffin, C. S., et al. (2024). Virtual laboratories complement but should not replace face-to-face practicals: Perceptions of life science students at Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland. Advances in Physiology Education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00227.2024.
31. Learning analytics in virtual labs Elmoazen, R., & co-authors. (2023). Learning analytics in virtual laboratories: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00244-y.
32.Virtual laboratories — perceptions / evaluation (Ireland project) Griffin, C. S., et al. (2024). Virtual laboratories complement but should not replace face-to-face practicals: Perceptions of life science students at Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland. Advances in Physiology Education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00227.2024.
33.Learning analytics in virtual labs Elmoazen, R., & co-authors. (2023). Learning analytics in virtual laboratories: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00244-y.
34.Virtual laboratories — perceptions/evaluation (Ireland project)
Griffin, C. S., et al. (2024). Virtual laboratories complement but should not replace face-to-face practicals: Perceptions of life science students at Dundalk Institute of Technology, Ireland. Advances in Physiology Education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00227.2024.
